Skip to main content

More on This Topic

A Blueprint to Strengthen Processing

DTCC, SWIFT and XBRL US announced in June the results of a business case advocating a transformation in the way corporate actions announcements are communicated in the U.S., allowing investors to receive information on such corporate actions as mergers, dividends, stock splits and other events in a more timely, accurate and less costly way, directly as specified by the issuer or offeror.

The business case, developed with key stakeholders from across the corporate actions processing supply chain – issuers, intermediaries and investors – documents the existing announcement process, highlights current problems and provides recommendations to solve those issues.

Global standards

The recommendations call for, among other things, a single set of global standards for corporate actions processing. According to the business case, this will bring greater accuracy, reduced risks and lower costs by improving transparency and communication between issuers and investors. A pilot program will be initiated late this year to implement the recommendations and further evaluate costs and benefits, with participation from issuers, intermediaries and investors.

The business case makes clear that use of the global standards by issuers will allow them to provide their key messages directly to investors or potential investors without the delays or potential errors inherent in the reliance, under today’s process, on interpretation by financial intermediaries. It also examines, for the first time, the complete corporate action process from announcement to completion, using a case study of Pfizer’s acquisition of Wyeth in 2009.

Four critical issues

The business case highlights four critical issues raised by issuers, intermediaries and investors in today’s corporate action announcement process that the proposed solution is designed to address:

  • Interpretation risk: Issuer messages are “free text,” e.g., news releases and regulatory filings, that must be interpreted, transformed and summarized by the financial services industry with no input from the issuer on the data conveyed.
  • Timing risk: The need for manual interpretation and intervention by intermediaries results in delays in communicating information to the investor.
  • Accuracy risk: Multiple parties extracting, manually rekeying and disseminating the same information increases the potential for errors delivered to the investor.
  • Costs: The lack of straight-through processing (STP) throughout the corporate action chain results in cost and liability being absorbed by the financial services industry.

Three recommendations

To address these issues, the business case makes three principal recommendations:

  • All parties to the process should adopt a single set of global information and technology standards, while continuing to support the current disclosure process;
  • Issuers should “tag” corporate action documents with XBRL (based upon the global ISO standard followed by the financial services industry), permitting easy, automated extraction of the data;
  • Intermediaries should consume and seamlessly disseminate the electronic version of the corporate action information as close to real time as possible or within a timeframe as requested by investors. @

[For a copy of the business case to improve corporate actions communications, and for more information about Issuer to Investor: Corporate Actions initiative, visit]